When evil is allowed to compete with good, evil has an emotional populist appeal that wins out unless good men & women stand as a vanguard against abuse.
When evil is allowed to compete with good, evil has an emotional populist appeal that wins out unless good men & women stand as a vanguard against abuse.
When evil is allowed to compete with good, evil has an emotional populist appeal that wins out unless good men & women stand as a vanguard against abuse.
To master the arts of opposable digets and language. The animals could handle the rest nicely.
As in... the beatific expression from on high shortly after all the "and it was goods" : "OOOPs, I made that one with thumbs... what will ever become of him????"
Last edited by Yestermorrow on Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
When evil is allowed to compete with good, evil has an emotional populist appeal that wins out unless good men & women stand as a vanguard against abuse.
Doesn't matter. It was the most daring experiment ever tried unless the membrainal juxtaposed multiverse theory proves to be true. To paraphrase The Professor: Change is here to stay.